Review Request: Add Progress Support for Git Clone Job

Andreas Pakulat apaku at gmx.de
Sun Dec 11 09:00:36 UTC 2011


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103380/#review8867
-----------------------------------------------------------


This is far too simple-thought, did you actually try this out? If the cloning is non-instant the progress will jump around because git has multiple stages which all print the progress from 0 to 100%.

In addition you're loosing the stderr output from git clone, I'm not sure wether its logged right now, but if its not it should be so in case something goes wrong during the clone the user can see the git output.

- Andreas Pakulat


On Dec. 10, 2011, 8:55 p.m., David Narváez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103380/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 10, 2011, 8:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Very naive approach to leverage stderr to get progress. I'm no expert on QProcesses so if anything looks bad or the idea is bad as a whole, just let me know.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 256832.
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256832
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   plugins/git/gitclonejob.h 3279ba1 
>   plugins/git/gitclonejob.cpp ce48ee7 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103380/diff/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1. Fetch a large project using the Git provider (I tried NetworkManager, for instance)
> 2. Fetch a project using the KDE provider
> 
> In both tests, before this patch, progress is not changed until the project is completely fetched (see bug 256832). After this patch, progress bar changes with the standard error. Notice that the bar is filled three times, I'm not sure how to avoid that without making the code overly complex, but I thought it was a nice start to at least have the progress in the critical part of the process which is the second time the progress bar fills (downloading objects).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Narváez
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20111211/4c7d00b9/attachment.html>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list