Project layout on

Niko Sams niko.sams at
Wed Mar 31 07:41:00 UTC 2010

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:59, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at> wrote:
> On 31.03.10 08:40:09, Niko Sams wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 23:47, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at> wrote:
>> > However I do think that if its split it should come with all
>> > the plugins that belong to webdevelopment, i.e. also move php stuff
>> > there. Which would make it harder (until Quanta is released) for people
>> > to gather everything necessary for web development.
>> That is a good argument.
>> Let's do it that way.
> Ok, so just to make it clear: thats quanta+php+php-docs+upload and
> whatever you want from playground?
Should we move the playground plugins into the kdevelop project now?
Or create individual projects for them?

>> One thing: how should the plugin repositories (eg. php) be named?
>> The name should somehow be kdevelop/quanta independent as it works for both.
>> just php? language-php? plugin-php? php-plugin?
> I'd just go for php or kdevplatform-php which would indicate more
> clearly that its a kdevplatform plugin.
hmm... php on the same level as kdevelop is confusing.
kdevplatform-php is a bit strange.
I'd vote for plugin-php or php-plugin


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list