svn2git

Mario Chacon the.masch at gmail.com
Tue Mar 9 22:02:06 UTC 2010


sorry, what does this plung-in do?

Thank you...
masch..

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:

> On 09.03.10 22:02:45, Niko Sams wrote:
> > I just pushed kdevelop-plugin-rules, afaics they are in pretty good
> > shape. (it's all very basic
> > as no branches at all are involved)
> > ...please review
>
> Awesome. I'll do a run with that tonight and see what the result looks
> like.
>
> > Andreas you said you want to convert python plugin, drop mine if you
> > manage to import the
> > parser properly.
>
> I'll play around a bit with that, maybe I can just add a recurse rule
> and the source work-branch, else we'll just drop that bit of history -
> IMHO. Its not overly useful anyway as the respective developer is gone
> and not reachable (AFAIK).
>
> > And I started with quanta rules and have now a problem with kxsldbg.
> > The plugin in quanta
> > has a build time dependency on sdk/kxsldbg - and that should get it's
> > own repository.
> > Any idea how to solve this?
>
> Fix the build-time dep. I see the following options:
> a) move the plugin into sdk/kxsldbg and make that depend on kdevplatform
> b) provide a proper library with exported symbols for ksxldbg which the
> plugin can use
> c) merge quanta and ksxldbg into one repo
>
> > And: what about sdk/doc?
>
> Hmm, I thought that stays where it is in svn, but maybe I'm wrong. I
> suggest to ask kde-scm-interest.
>
> Andreas
>
> --
> Cheer Up!  Things are getting worse at a slower rate.
>
> --
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20100309/8192cd06/attachment.html>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list