Project layout on gitorious.org
alexander.dymo at gmail.com
Tue Mar 2 00:48:26 UTC 2010
> Even if we don't fully support the plugins, it's good to have them in a
> central place so we have an overview what exists, and so that developers
> who are interested in working (and collaborating) on them can do it
Right, but you don't need to look at the list of plugins. You'd find out about
new plugins via blogs/mailinglists anyways. After that you don't need a
playground, you just clone the repo and work together. And it's still hosted
by the author.
Also, with gitorious you can follow people via rss, so you'll always know when
they're up on something.
For example, if I started Ruby support in git, I'd create my own repository.
Anyone interested would pull directly from me and push to my repo. I wouldn't
need a playground for that.
> We're anyway not enough to 'fully' support every (even working) plugin. How
> do you want to manage the point when a plugin becomes "supported" and when
> it becomes "unmaintained" again?
Maybe push changes back to author's repository and remove it from kdevelop
project? (dunno about privileges...)
But yeah, I can see your point. But that place for abandoned plugins wouldn't
be a playground, that'd be a blackhole :)
More information about the KDevelop-devel