more ui polishing: working sets

[Milian Wolff]

Niko Sams, 16.01.2010:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 14:54, Sam S. <smls75 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> > 
> > after two failed attempts to send a similar message to the
> > kdevelop-devel list this week (according to Andreas, possibly a
> > problem with the spam filter), here goes a third try...
> > I've completely rephrased the text and also added the kdevelop list as
> > recipient, so hopefully this time it'll reach you guys...
> > 
> > Anyhow, I've made a proposal (including detailed mockups) for how the
> > KDevelop UI elements regarding working sets could be made to look &
> > behave like so that this functionality will be
> >  - less intrusive for people who do not want to use it
> >  - still easy enough to discover, and easier to understand for people
> > who might want to try it
> >  - more comfortable to use for people who do use it
> > 
> > You can find it at:
> >   smls75.sqweebs.com/kdevelop working sets proposal/
> > 
> > What do you think? (Note that the green color is specific to my KDE
> > color scheme, it would probably look different for you.)
> 
> Very beautiful.
> 
> The thing I like most are the icons, we should use them asap.
> For the graphical redesign we need someone to implement it.
> 
> One suggestion from me: The user should have a possibility to give
> a workingset a title. However this should be completely optional.

I thought about giving the workingsets sequential titles like in the mockup, 
while giving the user the opportunity to change it by clicking on the title in 
the popup which would turn it into a lineedit with on-the-fly saving, just like 
we know it from e.g. Ajax apps.

-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20100116/1b677959/attachment.sig>