more ui polishing: working sets

[Milian Wolff]

Sam S., 16.01.2010:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:33 PM, David Nolden <zwabel at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > I didn't see the actual message, and cannot find it on the mailing list.
> > When did you send it, and can you send it again?
> 
> Hi David, thanks for your reply.
> 
> I sent the mail on January 8, you can see it at
> http://lists.kde.org/?t=126295898400003&r=1&w=2 ...
> I guess there might still be a problem with the mailing list (or it's
> spam filter) then?
> 
> > Basically, I do think working sets could be improved further, but I also
> > feel they work quite well the way they are now, and we have more serious
> > UI issues in the much more important "building" area that should IMO be
> > adressed with a higher priority (the connection between the "Project"
> > menu, "Buildsets", and the project tree view).
> 
> Yes, I certainly don't want to keep you from those areas... (The
> reason I didn't work on a proposal for the project handling stuff
> instead, is that I don't quite understand that myself... So I'll
> personally definitely be happy to see some UI improvements there...
> ;-))
> I was just hoping that in addition to that, the working sets UI
> cleanups I suggested (or at least a subset thereof) might *also* make
> it into the 4.0 release...

I will see if I can work on it. Since I got exams coming up a bit of GUI work 
without much side effects is certainly something I could fit in imo. But lets 
see when and how I can port your awesome mockups into reality.
-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20100116/4476e260/attachment.sig>