Auto-completion "eats" next symbol

[Esben Mose Hansen]

On Thursday 09 December 2010 16:29:11 Ciprian Ciubotariu wrote:
> I feel the workaround for option 3 is easier to perform than any of those
> for option 2. 

I think that hits the nail on the head. While it is *cool* when it works, the 
workaround is simply much worse that the alternative.

I note that bashcompletion also works in this way, and I have never been 
annoyed by that.

Hmm..

IDEA:

As the fancy solution, it could replace if and only if I start editing in the 
middle of an existing symbol.

-- 
Kind regards, Esben
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20101210/d4028466/attachment.html>