background-parser changes: mimetype and partial parses

Milian Wolff mail at milianw.de
Sun Aug 22 11:51:33 UTC 2010


David Nolden, 21.08.2010:
> @Milian: What were these changes supposed to be useful for? I though
> you had chosen the path of synchronously updating sub-context directly
> through the language-support instead of the background-parser. I think
> the background-parser architecture is already complicated enough, and
> really doesn't need these changes. Since there were merge conflicts, I
> didn't merge them into the movingranges branch now. Or was this just
> some "old" code or something like that?
> 
> Greetings, David

Hum? Sorry but what are you actually talking about? I thought you merged 
master into movingranges branch, and in master I didn't touch the background 
parser in a long time. (afair)

Only multilang contains changes which where reverted later on again.

Bye
-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20100822/ba442ac0/attachment.sig>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list