Hiding useless Qt Meta methods in Implementation Helper

[David Nolden]

2010/4/24 Milian Wolff <mail at milianw.de>:
> Try it out. They are there. And have been there since long.
>
> And just blindly filtering anything without a range is imo also not good,
> since sooner or later some user will get to us who defines something in a
> Macro and now doesn't get proper code completion ;-)
>
> I'd personally opt for the "it's a QObject, hide xyz", we are an IDE that
> wants to support Qt properly.

Well, I'd prefer to do the lowest amount of qt-specific hacking, and I
think it's pretty safe to assume that when the user didn't manually
declare something, then he also won't manually want to define it.

Then probably the "empty range" logic is just missing in the
implementation helper.