KDevelop 4 Beta 5 Artikel

[Milian Wolff]

On Sunday 08 November 2009 01:18:35 Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé - Developer wrote:
> Hi Milian!
> 
> About the comparison in the Wiki:
> Why shouldn't we mention the features of unsupported plugins? We could use
> another kind of tick. There is a section for Ruby. So we should mention
>  what is possible for Ruby-developers when they use the playground-plugin.
>  (for some plugins that's not really dangerous, for example the
>  Qt-designer) Otherwise the Ruby comparison does not make sense.

Imo on a different page. We could have a list of features for unsupported 
plugins with a list of what's working and what needs work.

Anybody up to write it?

-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20091108/611123f5/attachment.sig>