KDE/kdevelop/debuggers/gdb [POSSIBLY UNSAFE]

Aleix Pol aleixpol at kde.org
Mon May 4 22:14:26 UTC 2009


Hm... you're probably right, I'll try to fix it soon. (I have a very busy
week, hopefully for next week).

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:

> On 04.05.09 18:57:59, Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > SVN commit 963450 by apol:
> >
> > New attach to process interface using ksysguard widget. Copied over to
> kdevelop's repository until the original is on kdelibs.
> > +#FIXME: remove me when in kdelibs
> > +add_subdirectory(ksysguard)
> > +include_directories(ksysguard/processcore)
> > +#EoFIXME
>
> Why not compile this directly into the plugin? In other cases the main
> reason for having a shared, installed but non-public library without SONAME
> is simply that we'd like to avoid double-compilation of some larger parts
> and/or sharing of code between different plugins. However in this case I
> don't see a necessity for either of the two. And shared-libs without SONAME
> are a headache for packagers, so we should only use them if they provide
> some benefit.
>
> > +/* KDevelop CMake Support

Sure, sorry for that.

>
>
> Hmm, thats probably unintended :)
>
> --
> Expect the worst, it's the least you can do.
>
> _______________________________________________
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20090504/603eb4be/attachment.html>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list