Review Request: Black-box test for (D)VCS-plugins

[Robert Gruber]

Hi,

I coincidentally came across this post and was wondering what the problem with CVS was?

During development of the CVS plugin I used a local CVS repository by my self and never had any problems. When I last used my CVS plugin a few month ago KDevelop still worked fine with the local CVS repo. I guess not much has changed since then ;)

Maybe I can help you out on how to call the CVS plugin so it works for the test? What exactly was the problem?

I took a glimpse at the testcase and was wondering that no call to import() is in there? How do you set up the repository?

There is a small testcase for cvs-plugin's internal classes at:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdevplatform/plugins/cvs/tests/cvstest.cpp?view=markup

Although it tests the internal CvsProxy class and not the interface it might give you a hint on how to setup a local repo.


If you have any further questions I'll be happy to help.

Greets, Robert



-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:00:43 -0000
> Von: "Fabian Wiesel" <fabian.wiesel at googlemail.com>
> An: "Fabian Wiesel" <fabian.wiesel at googlemail.com>, "KDevelop" <kdevelop-devel at kdevelop.org>
> Betreff: Review Request: Black-box test for (D)VCS-plugins

> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/384/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Review request for KDevelop.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Tests the various plug-ins on consistency. Currently works with Subversion
> and Mercurial. CVS needs to be changed to allow local repositories.
> Currently checks:
> All: isVersionControlled(), status(), add(), revert(), commit() 
> DVCS: init()
> 
> The test also codifies a proposal of the expected behaviour of the
> interfaces, which would be the common denominator of Subversion and Mercurial.
> Because of that, I thought, I'd rather let this be reviewed, before
> spending more time on implementing more test-cases, which codify an unwanted
> behaviour.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/KDE/kdevelop/vcs/CMakeLists.txt 942616 
>   trunk/KDE/kdevelop/vcs/tests/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   trunk/KDE/kdevelop/vcs/tests/vcsBlackBoxTest.h PRE-CREATION 
>   trunk/KDE/kdevelop/vcs/tests/vcsBlackBoxTest.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/384/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Excluding CVS and Git:
> 
> 1/  1 Testing vcsBlackBoxTest                  Passed
> 
> 100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 1
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Fabian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel












-- 
______________________________
Robert Gruber -=- r.gruber at gmx.net

Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01