Stability of our beta
Andreas Pakulat
apaku at gmx.de
Wed Jan 28 17:42:17 UTC 2009
On 28.01.09 18:34:16, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 28.01.09 18:23:27, David nolden wrote:
> > I've implemented and checked in my workaround now, and it seems to work very
> > well. I've at least parsed full kdelibs with 2 parsing-threads on my dual-core
> > machine without a crash.
> >
> > Since i've also fixed some other crashes within the last days, and the
> > completion features I've added are low-risk while adding good value, I suggest
> > the current revision as new beta tag.
>
> I've also had to commit a bugfix which affects the run support. As tarballs
> have already been made I'll tag this as 3.9.91 and hence our first beta
> will have that version (and 3.9.90 will be a not-officially-released
> alpha).
PS: I just noticed that our beta tag of kdevelop actually requires
kdevplatform 0.9.85 (i.e. last alpha) - ooops.
And I wanted to say thanks to you David, you really put in a lot of effort
even though you have important real-life commitments.
Andreas
--
You will be held hostage by a radical group.
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list