Debbuger

Andreas Pakulat apaku at gmx.de
Tue Feb 3 17:32:33 UTC 2009


On 03.02.09 20:06:20, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 February 2009 19:42:26 David nolden wrote:
> > Am Dienstag 03 Februar 2009 07:48:48 schrieb Vladimir Prus:
> > > Oh, competition! That's always good :-)
> > >
> > > - Volodya
> > 
> > Would have been more useful if you actually said something about Hamish's 
> > points. ;-)
> > 
> > What do you think about the thing? I think Hamish's points are valid. We're 
> > coming closer to a release, and we do need a working debugger. If we had one 
> > that was working a year ago, then it's worth considering going back there.
> 
> Well, it is worth pointing out that in HEAD, to the best of my knowledge we
> have working thread/frame view, breakpoint widget, watches, and variable tooltips.
> We don't have display of local variables, and we don't have breakpoint markers in
> source. So, the most straightforward way to get a working debugger is to fix the
> missing thing. Branching from a Qt4 port of KDevelop 3 debugger which is known not
> to be very great seems like an equally complex way to get something worse.

Hmm, so it seems fixing the current plugin up shouldn't be too much work.
Maybe I can do a little exercise this weekend, as I was planning to fix
that up anyway (just couldn't decide on wether I should start with this or
designer) :)

Andreas

-- 
Better hope the life-inspector doesn't come around while you have your
life in such a mess.




More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list