target url from the project manager
Andreas Pakulat
apaku at gmx.de
Wed Oct 15 20:24:08 UTC 2008
On 15.10.08 19:20:42, Aleix wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 14 October 2008 21:50:55 Aleix wrote:
> > Or in that case rather ExecutableProjectItem::outputInformation. This
> > latter version imposes added complexity at least for the cmake support,
> > according to Aleix. Its easier for him to have the API on the buildsystem
> > manager.
>
>
> Well, actually, as I said, now I am storing the information in the item data
> (that's why I said), so it is ok to have it in the item.
> I'm fine with whatever implementation as soon as we have the way to retrieve
> the information.
Oh, didn't think far enough apparently. Thats quite nice. So I'm voting for
having the item's provide the information. That way we can add it
incrementall, i.e. for now we just provide a builtUrl()+installUrl() method
on Executable and Test target items and once we have the need we can add
the needed methods to library and generic targets.
> Btw, I still think that the executable url is the executable path itself and
> we don't want the .shell file. We can retrieve the information from the
> .shell file from the buildmanager.
Actually I agree that we should provide only 1 url for the built and
installed version, however for the built version of cmake projects this
should be the .shell variant. The .shell version allows to run an
executable without having to install the whole project. Granted for KDE
apps thats not quite true, as you still need to have .desktop files,
plugins and so on installed. But it still makes it easier to test a change
in a library.
Other buildsystems don't have such a thing, so there we have no choice.
What I'm not sure about is how to choose between the installed and the
in-builddir version of a target. That needs to be inside the run-gui
somehow...
Andreas
--
You will contract a rare disease.
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list