KDevelop projectfile-less project capability
Aleix
aleixpol at gmail.com
Sun Aug 10 08:37:08 UTC 2008
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 10.08.08 01:53:29, Aleix wrote:
> > Along with the uiless, I've been working on in a generator using duchain
> > (may be a better or worse idea) and I need to have a dummy project
> manager
> > instantiated in runtime depending on the file we are working on. To have
> it
> > i need to open the project without any some.kdev4 file because of its
> nature
> > (the biggest problem is not that it is not a plugin but that it needs to
> be
> > opened from a file).
>
> Can you be more verbose about that sentence in parenthesis? Why is it a
> problem that you have a single-file-project? And why is it a single-file
> project anyway, shouldn't the project cover all the files from which you
> want to generate something?
Because I'm creating 1 file every time. We will discuss it better when my
code is in trunk btw.
>
>
> > Here it is a patch that lets you specify any project that will work the
> way
> > the user wants to (instead of our cosmos).
>
> As I said via private mail I don't want to block you in your SoC, so if
> it is too much trouble without the method I'm ok for it to go in for
> now. But I don't want to see this method in our API after the freeze
> anymore, unless we find it really useful - not just for the generator.
Ok, I will commit it within the next to days and I hope we will try to find
a solution about it at some point soon.
And I'm sure we will :)
Thanks
Aleix
>
>
> Andreas
>
> --
> You are going to have a new love affair.
>
> _______________________________________________
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20080810/d6824a3f/attachment.html>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list