The future of docbook documentation

[Andreas Pakulat]

On 27.03.07 22:41:30, Alexander Dymo wrote:
> On Saturday 17 March 2007 22:15, Alexander Dymo wrote:
> > But we failed to maintain the user manual. The contributions to the manual
> > were rare and sporadical despite the 3.x stable series has been in
> > development for 3 years.
> 
> I've found this one today:
> http://doc-book.sourceforge.net/homepage/
> A wiki which saves docbook xml files. What if we use it?

I think this is a good idea - if the outcomming docbook is well
formated, i.e. really usable. If the docbook output is similarly screwed
as html output from M$ word or such stuff its not really wort it.

One thing that keeps me from writing docbook stuff is that the format is
not as easy as plain text or wiki-like syntax.

Andreas

-- 
You have an unusual understanding of the problems of human relationships.