KDevPlatform code review and documentation

Matt Rogers mattr at kde.org
Sat Jul 14 13:22:55 UTC 2007

On Saturday 14 July 2007 01:26, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Saturday 14 July 2007, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > We don't necessarily need to have an organized code review. We can
> > all review code as time and motivation permits. Smaller reviews
> > (perhaps a class or two, or a set of interrelated interfaces) are
> > more preferred than wide sweeping reviews.
> Matt, the decision there was to do such a review during the hacking
> session by all those present at aKademy. As I left earlier, I couldn't
> attend this review and was asking if it was really done or not.
> Andras

Right, I understood that. Obviously it wasn't done or there would have been 
commits related to it. 

But rather than wait around for somebody else to review and document, I was 
trying to encourage everybody to take it upon themselves to do it. We don't 
need to wait to have an organized review (although those are quite nice). All 
of us are responsible for the quality of the code and documentation after 
all. :)

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list