KDevPlatform code review and documentation

Andras Mantia amantia at kde.org
Sat Jul 14 06:26:57 UTC 2007

On Saturday 14 July 2007, Matt Rogers wrote:
> We don't necessarily need to have an organized code review. We can
> all review code as time and motivation permits. Smaller reviews
> (perhaps a class or two, or a set of interrelated interfaces) are
> more preferred than wide sweeping reviews.

Matt, the decision there was to do such a review during the hacking 
session by all those present at aKademy. As I left earlier, I couldn't 
attend this review and was asking if it was really done or not.


Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20070714/e1570e32/attachment.sig>

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list