The name of this project is KDevelop

[David Nolden]

Am Sonntag, 21. Januar 2007 17:55 schrieb Jakob Petsovits:
> My opinion is that the code is what's important. You've got lot's of ideas
> how to make KDevelop better, and I believe your contributions to either the
> fork or the re-renamed KDevelop Platform are good for everyone.
>
> I'm very opposed to the idea of splitting our work forces over a naming
> issue. I've got the impression that changing Koncrete back to KDevelop is
> far more important to you than keeping the name is for Matt or Alexander.
> ("It's just a fucking name, right?") Working on KDevelop 4 _together_ will
> get us further than having a fork.
>
> Thus, I suggest to rename Koncrete back to KDevelop Platform, namespace the
> lib/ classes with KDevPlatform:: and make one KDevelop 4 that rocks,
> instead of two different KDevelops that are merely sufficient.
>
> The code is more important than the name.
>
> Thanks,
>   Jakob

This is 100% my opinion. 

"namespace KDevPlatform = Koncrete" or "namespace Koncrete = KDevPlatform" 
would also solve the problem... ;-)

greetings, David