KDevelop4 architecture rework

[Mathieu Chouinard]

On Sunday 21 January 2007 10:36, Roberto Raggi wrote:
> Hi
>
> Quoting Alexander Dymo <dymo at ukrpost.ua>:
> > On Sunday 21 January 2007 16:49, Roberto Raggi wrote:
> >> Just a little thing. The name of this project *is* KDevelop. If we will
> >> have a platform the name of the platform will be the KDevelop
> >> Platform(codename whatever you want for the release 4.0). BTW I don't
> >> think Quanta will be based on KDevelop. Quanta is a great product, with
> >> dedicated developers.
> >> KDevelop4 is a broken platform that needs at least 1-2 years of work.
> >> The Quanta project already has a good code base and a nice GUI. If we
> >> want the Quanta guys to switch to KDevelop we have to show that
> >> KDevelop is a good platform for Quanta. That means they will *evaluate*
> >> the KDevelop Platform at the end of 2007.
> >
> > Let's better ask what Andras and Jens (Herden) think about that.
>
> Of course is not that I want to talk for the Quanta developers. I'm
> sorry if the Quanta guys think I did it. My point is, they need a
> platform before. And the platform will not be ready in few months. I
> hope you understant that.
>
> >> Again, if KDevelop is not good for you then feel free to start the
> >> Koncrete project. This *is* KDevelop!
> >
> > If we want to have Quanta and KDevelop based on the same code,
> > we need to have a dedicated name and location. The name is Koncrete
> > and the (future) location is trunk/KDE/koncrete
>
> I'm 100% fine with it. But I hope you understand that koncrete is
> something different than KDevelop.
>
> I'm not sure I'm interested in KDevelop4. I thin will skip this
> release, and I will start KDevelop 5.0 based on a few selected
> interfaces from the 3.x branch.
>
> ciao robe
Roberto if we change the koncrete name to something like kdevelopbase is it ok 
for you and we keep sublime for the name of the UI
Mathieu
-- 
<seemant> you should always know where your inodes are, and who they are with