KDevelop4 architecture rework

[Roberto Raggi]

Hi

Quoting Alexander Dymo <dymo at ukrpost.ua>:

> On Sunday 21 January 2007 16:49, Roberto Raggi wrote:
>> Just a little thing. The name of this project *is* KDevelop. If we will
>> have a platform the name of the platform will be the KDevelop
>> Platform(codename whatever you want for the release 4.0). BTW I don't
>> think Quanta will be based on KDevelop. Quanta is a great product, with
>> dedicated developers.
>> KDevelop4 is a broken platform that needs at least 1-2 years of work.
>> The Quanta project already has a good code base and a nice GUI. If we
>> want the Quanta guys to switch to KDevelop we have to show that
>> KDevelop is a good platform for Quanta. That means they will *evaluate*
>> the KDevelop Platform at the end of 2007.
> Let's better ask what Andras and Jens (Herden) think about that.

Of course is not that I want to talk for the Quanta developers. I'm 
sorry if the Quanta guys think I did it. My point is, they need a 
platform before. And the platform will not be ready in few months. I 
hope you understant that.

>
>> Again, if KDevelop is not good for you then feel free to start the
>> Koncrete project. This *is* KDevelop!
> If we want to have Quanta and KDevelop based on the same code,
> we need to have a dedicated name and location. The name is Koncrete
> and the (future) location is trunk/KDE/koncrete

I'm 100% fine with it. But I hope you understand that koncrete is 
something different than KDevelop.

I'm not sure I'm interested in KDevelop4. I thin will skip this 
release, and I will start KDevelop 5.0 based on a few selected 
interfaces from the 3.x branch.

ciao robe


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.