KDevelop automake support... living in the past?
Matthew Woehlke
mw_triad at users.sourceforge.net
Thu Jan 18 16:56:05 UTC 2007
Matt Rogers wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 January 2007 5:46 pm, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> Matt Rogers wrote:
>>> Actually, I intend to significantly expand the feature set for the
>>> automake support. I just haven't had time to work on it much for the last
>>> 9 months or so.
>> Awesome! :-) (And I'll assume that includes not doing deprecated things
>> in the auto-generated files? ;-) ...the autoconf list will be happy to
>> tell you what those are. In fact, at some point posting a bare project
>> there and having them poke holes in it probably wouldn't be a bad idea.)
>
> Even better would be for them to provide up to date documentation in their
> manual or via other means, so I don't have to bug them for anything. :)
Hmm? Actually, the things I've been griped at about /are/ documented
(meaning, the doc matches the usage - which differs from my
auto-generated project - that I was told to use). I'm thinking in
particular of AC_INIT, AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, AC_LANG_CPP... at least those
are the ones that have come up so far. Especially AC_INIT which seems to
be used wrong throughout all of KDE (that's a somewhat peripheral issue,
although KDevelop doesn't seem to be discouraging such (mis)use).
--
Matthew
"What a wonderful smell you've discovered!" -- Princess Leia Organa
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list