gmane and kdevelop-bugs

[Matt Rogers]

On Jan 4, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:

> Matt Rogers wrote:
>> On Thursday 21 December 2006 14:09, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>>> Just wondering; is there a reason that gmane is carrying kdevelop- 
>>> devel
>>> but not kdevelop-bugs?
>>
>> I don't think anybody asked them to carry it.
>
> Ok, bad question. Does anyone /object/ to having kdevelop-bugs on  
> gmane? :-)

I don't see the point personally, but I'm not against the idea. Can  
you explain how having gmane carry kdevelop-bugs is good for us?
--
Matt