KDE/kdevelop [POSSIBLY UNSAFE]

[Andreas Pakulat]

On 24.04.07 00:50:33, David Nolden wrote:
> On Monday 23 April 2007 21:23:52 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> http://www.hyperrealm.com/commoncpp/commoncpp-faq.html says 
> "Current platform support includes Mac OS X, POSIX systems such as GNU/Linux 
> and Solaris, and Microsoft Windows (2000 and later).", are you sure? And 
> don't you confuse it with GNU Common C++?(as seen in the faq).

In fact I did confuse it :) I'll have another try later today.

> Which does not mean that I don't think that it would be useful optionally 
> using qt for that stuff, because that would increase acceptance of the 
> library for kde-development.

Well, the question is who does the porting, if you don't have the time.
Unless I see problems on windows with either Common-C++ or the Boost
libs I think there's no real need to port it.

As far as being optional goes: I think we shouldn't compile any plugin
for which there are missing dependecies. Of course there need to be
messages on cmake time that these dependecies are missing, but if the
user doesn't install them we should just disable the plugin in question.

Andreas

-- 
You shall be rewarded for a dastardly deed.