KDE/kdevelop [POSSIBLY UNSAFE]

Andreas Pakulat apaku at gmx.de
Mon Apr 23 19:55:55 UTC 2007


On 23.04.07 17:49:39, David Nolden wrote:
> On Monday 23 April 2007 05:43:37 Matt Rogers wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 April 2007 18:56, David Nolden wrote:
> > You didn't mention that this was going into trunk. I just assumed you were
> > updating the branch so that it would compile with trunk.
> >
> > I wish you would reconsider the use of all these external libraries that
> > add extra dependencies and provide functionality that most likely overlaps
> > with what's provided with Qt.
> >
> > I also don't think all of the stuff that's in lib should be there. lib is
> > the platform, it should be small and compact and what's there now applies
> > mostly to the teamwork plugin and i feel it should be moved there.
> 
> I used those libraries because I wanted the server to be independent from qt, 
> because I wanted to develop a good networking-system(after having written a 
> few ugly hacks earlier in my life ;) that could be reused for any type of 
> project, not only for qt-projects.
> 
> Here's what the libraries are needed for:
> Common-C++   --  cross-platform networking and threading(could be replaced by 
> qt)

As I suspected this doesn't work on windows easily, so we definetly need
to replace this.

Andreas

-- 
You need more time; and you probably always will.




More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list