[RFC] Workingstyle of different VCS systems

[Matt Rogers]

On Thursday 05 April 2007 20:26, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 05.04.07 19:20:12, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > On Apr 5, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > Do other VCS systems need other actions? Is there stuff that cannot be
> > > mapped to other VCS systems?
> >
> > push and pull (or clone, in git's case) actions need to be covered,
> > for distributed systems such as git and svk.
>
> I'll take this one to reply to you :)
>
> Yeah, I didn't think of those distributed ones (I used svk some time
> ago, not very long though). See my last response to Matthew, I think
> these actions should be part of a IDistributedSCM interface which
> specifically contains actions for distributed SCM's. The same for
> branching/tagging (not sure about a name here yet).
>

A separate interface sounds like a great idea.

> As for the mkdir, I have to agree, I more or less just copied the svn
> help output for the initial mail :P
>
> Andreas

Shame on you. ;)
-- 
Matt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20070405/2f496e80/attachment.sig>