KDE/kdevelop/languages/cpp/parser
Matt Rogers
mattr at kde.org
Fri Sep 29 12:14:41 UTC 2006
On Friday 29 September 2006 04:32, Alexander Dymo wrote:
> On Friday 29 September 2006 07:57, Hamish Rodda wrote:
> > The c++ parser needs kdevplatform, which I think is reasonable.
>
> Yes, currently this is the way to go. People would want not the ast from
> the parsers, but the codemodel and duchain. That means that all parsers
> _will_ depend from kdevplatform.
>
> > I agree that these should be separate from the platform. I'm also
> > hesitant to guarantee binary compatilibity, what with the limited
> > manpower we already have, it's an unwanted burden in the parsers...
>
> Agree.
>
Then perhaps as we get close to releasing KDE 4, we can push the parsers as
some of the first pieces of code (besides KDevelop and Quanta) that use the
platform
--
Matt
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list