KDE/kdevelop/languages/cpp/parser

[Alexander Dymo]

On Friday 29 September 2006 07:57, Hamish Rodda wrote:
> The c++ parser needs kdevplatform, which I think is reasonable.
Yes, currently this is the way to go. People would want not the ast from the
parsers, but the codemodel and duchain. That means that all parsers _will_ 
depend from kdevplatform.

> I agree that these should be separate from the platform.  I'm also hesitant
> to guarantee binary compatilibity, what with the limited manpower we
> already have, it's an unwanted burden in the parsers...
Agree.