Namespacing in kdevelop/lib

[Dominik Haumann]

On Wednesday 19 July 2006 12:22, Jakob Petsovits wrote:
> On Wednesday, 19. July 2006 09:50, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > But if you anyway want to namespace it, call simply KDevelop. Calling
> > it "KDev" doesn't bring any extra readability (even now all classes
> > start that way), KDevPlatform is also a cryptic name, KDevelopPlatform
> > might be good, but it is long.
>
> I'm not against namespacing, and I agree with the above reasoning,
> so count another vote for KDevelop::Xyz.
>
> I do hope that people won't be "using namespace KDevelop;" when it
> hurts readability. I think the KDevelop hackers are be knowledgable
> enough to care about that.

also for signals/slots you have to type the full qualifier, otherwise it 
won't work, but hey, all of you know that :)

Greetings,
Dominik