RC 2 or final?
apaku at gmx.de
Tue Dec 5 14:43:17 UTC 2006
On 04.12.06 15:34:00, Matt Rogers wrote:
> A lot of stuff has been fixed since RC 1 went out the door and rather
> than just rolling the final release and be done with it, I wonder if
> we should roll an RC 2 first in order to get some feedback from the
> community about the stability, etc. of it.
> So, the big question is:
> RC 2 or KDevelop 3.4 final?
As the other's I am for a rc2. There's been some change in the qmake
manager which hasn't been tested that much - although the two main
testers Ian and Stephan didn't complain yet. And I'm going to make the
change to the context menu later today.
On the other hand if rc2 again takes two weeks from tagging to release,
I'm not so sure about it. Because then we'd only have 3 weeks or so
between rc2 release and the kde 3.5.6 release - which I guess is still
the target for 3.4 final?
Regardless of this decision I think a message freeze should be turned on
and the translators notified. There were quite many message changes in
3.4 which needs translation and kdevelops translation is kept in
A vivid and creative mind characterizes you.
More information about the KDevelop-devel