Jens Herden jens at kdewebdev.org
Sun Apr 30 07:16:05 UTC 2006

> While kdevelop4 was basically useless, and the devs interested all run
> trunk, it was fine to depend on trunk.

I understand this very well and probably I would have done the same.

> Now, as there is more interest from other devs, I agree we should switch to
> snapshot.
> So, I'm fine with depending on snapshot.  We can do this either now (and
> revert the setWatcher() -> addWatcher() change), or with the next snapshot
> (+ i won't commit stuff that needs trunk from then).

For me it would be fine to wait until the next snapshot.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20060430/b36fe6f8/attachment.sig>

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list