change of maintainership in KDevelop
dymo at mk.ukrtelecom.ua
Sun Apr 2 18:17:02 UTC 2006
On Sunday 02 April 2006 17:34, Matt Rogers wrote:
> Also, it was suggested that rather than maintainership being the burden of
> just one person, it should be shared between a group of people with one
> person being the "lead" maintainer.
> I also volunteered for the position of
> lead maintainer as well.
You have my vote :)
> The group maintainership thing is in no way meant
> to be exclusionary. It's purpose is actually to provide other developers
> with a place to go so that they can get an answer from people who know more
> about KDevelop than the average developer. Please let me know if you'd like
> to volunteer.
Ok. I'd like to join you as one of the maintainers group. Does anyone have
> I hope to have everyone's support and I'd be happy to answer any questions
> or concerns.
I had my questions already answered at irc and I completely agree with two
answers I got
- http://www.kdevelop.org/mediawiki/index.php/Maintainers is too specific and
should be revised
- maintainters group should be no larger than 5 people
PS: let's not assign maintainers for specific parts of kdevelop. I'd opt for
some "maintainership freedom" ;)
More information about the KDevelop-devel