kdevelop/languages/cpp

[Matt Rogers]

On Wednesday 09 March 2005 11:46 am, Richard Dale wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 March 2005 15:53, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 March 2005 04:56 am, Richard Dale wrote:
> > > Isn't it normal to discuss with the author, before you go about
> > > reformating all their code?
> >
> > The author has already stated that he has no interest in maintaining any
> > more of his code for KDevelop 3.x, so I don't see the problem.
>
> The problem is that the cvs history is now screwed, and diffs before and
> after this change can no longer be compared.
>

oh no!!! cvs history is messed up!! all hope is lost! </dripping sarcasm>

> You are not the sole maintainer of this code, and have no right (in my
> opinion) to just go in and reformat it without and sort of discussion on
> the kdevelop-devel at kdevelop.org list. You might like to at least justify
> what you thought was wrong with the original formatting, and why you think
> it's been improved.
>
> -- Richard

Adam Treat and I will be maintaining code completion and we decided on IRC 
(adam and I, with agreement of alex dymo) to change the formatting to 
something we both agreed on, in addition to making the formatting consistent, 
since as Adam already pointed out to you, there were four copyright holders 
and about 12 different coding styles. discussion on kdevelop-devel is 
irrelevant as long as there is a discussion somewhere, so maybe you should 
join us in #kdevelop on freenode so you're in the loop.

Matt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20050309/6c09375b/attachment.sig>