New parser branch (Was: Dumping the source DOM?)

Matt Rogers mattr at
Wed Jul 13 14:11:06 UTC 2005

On Wednesday 13 July 2005 04:43 am, Roberto Raggi wrote:
> Hi!
> On Wednesday 13 July 2005 11:31, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > To make my position clear, I'm not biased against your work. If it can
> > parse Boost, then it's good enough for KDevelop.
> now I'll make my position clear. I don't care about boost! "good enough for
> KDevelop" is different from "be able to parser boost"!! parse a file
> doesn't mean nothing! Store and understand the code in realtime is the only
> important thing.

except that you have to care, or find someone who will maintain your code for 
you after it's all released because people will report bugs, etc. and expect 
those bugs to be fixed. Here's your first bug report. ;) 

> > Oh... you mean the parser provides this, but symbol table can't store it?
> check yourself! take a look at kdevelop4-parser/ast.h and then take a look
> at codemodel.h in kdevelop/lib/interfaces
> ciao robe

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list