Andras Mantia amantia at kde.org
Sun Jul 3 19:23:03 UTC 2005

On Sunday 03 July 2005 20:10, Adam Treat wrote:
> On Saturday 02 July 2005 10:37 am, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > 1) it is not needed
> > 2) it is against the Qt licensing. Qt is under GPL, while urlutil
> > is under LGPL and we are not allowed to relicense it.
> *sigh* it sucks that we still haven't licked such basic licensing
> questions. Ask yourself, if Qt (because one of its available licenses
> is GPL) does not allow a derivative LGPL ... then how can kdelibs be
> LGPL?  Answer: QPL.

No, this is not about derivate work, it is about copying the source from 
Qt to an LGPL licensed code. Does QPL allow this?

Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20050703/970627f0/attachment.sig>

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list