treat at kde.org
Sun Jul 3 19:19:04 UTC 2005
On Saturday 02 July 2005 10:37 am, Andras Mantia wrote:
> 1) it is not needed
> 2) it is against the Qt licensing. Qt is under GPL, while urlutil is
> under LGPL and we are not allowed to relicense it.
*sigh* it sucks that we still haven't licked such basic licensing questions.
Ask yourself, if Qt (because one of its available licenses is GPL) does not
allow a derivative LGPL ... then how can kdelibs be LGPL? Answer: QPL.
More information about the KDevelop-devel