KDevelop 3.1 - Release or postpone?

Amilcar do Carmo Lucas amilcar at ida.ing.tu-bs.de
Fri Jul 23 00:22:04 UTC 2004

On Thursday 22 July 2004 18:56, Ian Reinhart Geiser wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2004 06:13 am, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 July 2004 11:30, Alexander Dymo wrote:
> > [...]
> Yes, but what about the last QMake patch that came after the freeze?
I tried to test it but it did not compile out-of-the box.
Did someone tested it?

> What about the quirkyness of the designer part?
I do not use QT and I think many people out there also do not use it.

> I think we are rushing a release for no good reason.
A good reason are the 118 bugs that are fixed in 3.1 and are present in *all* 
3.0.x releases. I used the bugzilla to count them.

> We gain nothing from a release with KDevelop 
> except we dont have to make a press release.
No, we do have to do the press release anyways :) They don't do it for us.

We gain the translations, and we gain the publicity.

> Having a few extra weeks IMHO is well worth it.
Is good but it will not fix all the problems. We can do a separate release 

I released the KDevelop 3.0.1 more or less alone. It's easy enough.
And we can do it according to Alexander's time plan.

Amilcar Lucas
Current webmaster
The KDevelop project

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list