KDevelop 3.0.1

Amilcar do Carmo Lucas amilcar at ida.ing.tu-bs.de
Wed Sep 24 22:08:04 UTC 2003


Christian Loose wrote:

>Am Mittwoch, 24. September 2003 20:34 schrieb Alexander Dymo:
>  
>
>>It is time to clarify my opinion :)
>>
>>    
>>
>>>2) remove cvspart
>>>      
>>>
>>Veto unless we provide a solution to perform cvs operations on
>>KDE < 3.2 without cervisia installed.
>>Currently cvspart is the only solution that works without cervisia.
>>We can leave it for the 3.0 release and maybe remove after the release.
>>Importing cervisia into KDevelop source tree is not the best solution
>>especially when we are closing to the release.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>AFAIK the cvsservice part only depends on cervisia's dcop service 
>(cvsservice). So if really necessary you could import just the cvsservice 
>subdirectory of cervisia into KDevelop's source tree. There should be no 
>problem to make it compile under KDE 3.1 (but I don't know about KDE 3.0).
>
>  
>
I can confirm that. I compile cervisia HEAD under KDE 3.1.3 with no probs.

-- 
Amilcar Lucas







More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list