Gideon snapshot

[jbb]

It's a worry that we keep recommending an unreleased gideon over the "stable" 
kdevelop. Guarantee'd to annoy the users, but it's difficult to do otherwise. 
We need to move forward and release gideon as soon as we can.

Perhaps we should put a plan forward for a final release, (in a couple of 
months, for instance) It may help us focus for that short period. Continuing 
with alphas just allows us to ...continue with alphas :-)

jbb

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 08:34, F at lk Brettschneider wrote:
> Caleb Tennis wrote:
> >FYI,
> >
> >There's another "official" source snapshot available in the kde ftp site -
> >this will supercede the alpha4a release.
> >
> >ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/unstable/kdevelop-3.0-030620/src
> >
> >I will update the web page asap - I was having problems with cvs last
> > night so hopefully it's fixed today.
>
> More and more bugfix reports are answered with "alpha4 is too old".
> In my opinion, we need a real release, say Alpha5.
>
> Because KDE's first 3.2 release is still a little bit too far in the
> future, and our latest release is too old.
> Alpha5 because the TODO list of current_work.html (see www.kdevelop.org)
> is still big enough concerning to the important issues and it seems
> people still don't want a feature freeze which is typical for a
> Alpha-to-Beta stage transition.
>
> What do you think?
> We need to focus on that TODO list now.
> Ciao
> F at lk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kdevelop-devel mailing list
> Kdevelop-devel at barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
> http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel