A common roadmap

[Matthias Hölzer-Klüpfel]

On Friday 29 March 2002 17:32, Roland Krause wrote:

> we are both wasting our time with this, we had this discussion so many
> times here that even I cant stand it anymore. It goes like this.

Yes, it is boring. I had hoped it would have gained a bit more substance over 
the last months ;)

> I will say: "Gideon doesnt have MDI"
> You will say: "but MDI is a broken concept"

No. Of course _I_ think MDI is broken. But my answer always was: "I don't care 
enough about MDI to put it in, but if anyone cares, he is welcome to put it 
in". And I always thought that there would be enough people who care about it 
that it would be added instantly. Strangely enough, until now only Harry 
seems to be interested in putting MDI into gideon.

> I will say: "Gideon doesnt support Tools with arguments"
> You will say: "That can be easily fixed... "
> I will say: "Building projects is broken"
> You will say: "Fix it"

Well, gideon is alpha software, so this is nothing that troubles me.

> Here is my final point on the subject, if you can put MDI in gideon as
> the central view management I will support gideon.

This is what I suspected. All this boils down to is "MDI, MDI". Ok. This seems 
to be a low price :-)

Bye,
Matthias.