The result of the whole discussion about Gideon and 2.2 (was: Re: A common roadmap)

[August Hörandl]

Falk Brettschneider wrote:
> 
> GIDEON_BRANCH or everything in HEAD in parallel?
> Roland!?!? Others!?!?
> We need a decision NOW!

if i think of all the questions "whats gideon ?"  and the 
complicated checkout procedures (different tags) i would vote
for HEAD only

maybe there should be 3 subprojects
  kdevelop
   +- kdevelop     
   +- gideon     
   +- parts          common, used by both


Gustl
-- 
August Hörandl                         august.hoerandl at gmx.at
M$: Our software of tomorrow will make sure that on your hardware
of tomorrow everything will work at the usual speed. ;-)