Invitation to IRC party

[Eray Ozkural (exa)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 17 October 2001 08:25, you wrote:
> Friends,
> today Ian Geiseri and I met on IRC on #kde and after we yelled at each
> other for a while, we agreed that it would be a great idea to get
> together and discuss the future of our beloved project. We decided that
> IRC would be a good medium short of a real developers meeting which we
> can not have.
>
> So, in order to get this conducted in a civilized manner we should
> first agree on time and date. I would propose end of next week, i.e.
> the 26'th.
>

Hi Roland,

As a newbie kdevelop koder, I'm eager to hear your opinions. Would this IRC 
meeting be held on #kde or would #kdevelop be a better place?

> Further we should have some idea what we want to drink, aehem, no
> wrong, what we want to discuss. Ian and I robbed off about the old MDI
> SDI discussion, that's getting old, we all have insulted each other
> over that way to many times, but send in your ideas. Maybe the list of
> desired features?
>

I'd like to work on a generic "graph based browsing" component similar to the 
stuff in source navigator. It's just in the idea phase now, but it's not 
going to be UML. (I know this will raise questions since there is already a 
bunch of people working on UML stuff. Have a look at source navigator and 
sniff first ;)

Some wishlist entries:
 1) Porting of "stuff that works" in 2.x to HEAD
 2) Making the UI most extensible, some sort of MDI probably, but ultimately 
it boils down to technical decisions as I see.
 3) Making project information persistent. Through a database or other (fast) 
means.
 
> Last but not least, this is going to be a party, not a flamefest! We
> are going to celebrate, hmmm, let me think, we are going to celebrate
> that KDEStudio actually does what KDevelop promised and that they
> kicked our ass and we look like a bunch of loosers.... Naaahhhh...

:P I actually don't think that KDEStudio kicks KDevelop's ass, but have to 
check the latest version from them for a fair comparison. :)

I recommend that we seriously analyze what other IDE's have been offering and 
which features would be targeted for a future release.

Regards,

- -- 
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B  EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7zcVnfAeuFodNU5wRAkgUAJwMSYsmyJEdnf0OTmeXcv7v91rQxwCeP+pa
XITzpMd0RSBorx5zli2dxl4=
=WCia
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«