Using kdevelop 2 to code for gideon

[Eray Ozkural (exa)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 22 November 2001 21:00, Roland Krause wrote:
> Eray,
> I'd leave it out for now.
> We have to remove all user dependent information from it first. I am
> surprised there is any actually. We did this for KDevelop-2.
> Also when the project structure changes often it isnt a good idea.
>
> For automake generated projects I am a bit surprised why this file is
> needed at all.
>

I'd looked at the output of a cvs diff and had seen:
[General]
AMChanged=false
author=exa aka Eray Ozkural
dir_where_make_will_be_called=./
email=erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.tr


Which isn't quite correct. But surely those fields could be fixed, except 
that there shouldn't be a problem. I've used kdevelop 2 in cvs of some of my 
projects and this wouldn't be so different. It's a bit large here (>200k), 
but looks like it's not a big deal.

The differences shouldn't be too large although the project is updated and 
there aren't that many file additions/removals, and those take effect only 
when the project file is actually modified (by those who use it).

I'd already removed that file but I think we could put back in a file named 
properly (such as kdevelop-3.0.kdevprj or gideon.kdevprj). As Falk says, it's 
not a bad idea.

It's also kind of proof-of-concept. Using kdevelop to develop kdevelop, and 
it works with CVS too. :)

Thanks,

- -- 
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B  EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7/U+wfAeuFodNU5wRAsl7AJ9mEsbpMp3aFwJW40YeA2jxP/xs9wCfWgRv
fIUL1fcxXnlwALCZ+Pue11g=
=zQS/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«