Gideon under KDE2

[Roland Krause]

To me the case is clear, KDevelop-2.0.2 with KDE-3. The version number
indicates that this is a minor bugfix release. I

f we wanted to indicate that we adapted to KDE-3 and Qt-3, maybe we
should raise it to 2.1.0 instead.
 
Also, gideon stays in cvs until ready. 

Ralf, what do you say? 

Roland

--- "F at lk Brettschneider" <gigafalk at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Harald Fernengel wrote:
> > 
> > does ist make sense to release KDevelop 2 along with KDE3? 
> > People will expect
> > new features with a new major release, which we don't have.
> The people will want KDevelop also for KDE3.
> Technically, we need to recompile and relink to KDE3/Qt3.
> Otherwise, people would need kdelibs2 additionally installed to run
> KDevelop. 
> It would be the same situation as with KDE2 and KDevelop-1.3;
> KDevelop-1.4 was just thought as 1:1 port to the new KDE generation.
> 
> > Maybe we should
> > detach KDevelop 2 from the KDE release cycle and release one or two
> minor
> > bug-fix releases when the time is right.
> I love to be in the KDE release cycle. The short time distances
> between
> their releases enables to keep KDevelop very synchronized with the
> latest bugfixes without any effort for us. 
> For example: today I fixed an evil memory leak but unfortunately I
> must
> wait until KDevelop-2.0.3 that fortunately could be soon, the
> KDE3-beta1
> date.
> 
> > 
> > For KDE3 I suggest a parallel Gideon Beta 1 or RC 1 release.
> In my opinion the user of KDevelop is the target group for a release
> with KDE, not possible developers of KDevelop. There are daily cvs
> snapshots for the latter.
> 
> New version means to make users more happy not to show that there's
> still something going on. ;-)
> 
> Don't get me wrong, in the long run KDevelop-3 will be the next
> generation but it's not today. Distributors would be confused, users
> would be disappointed with the downgrade. Detach Gideon from KDE
> release
> cycles, stabilize version 2 WITHOUT ADDING NEW FEATURES.
> 
> Ciao,
> F at lk
> 
> 
> > 
> > Harry
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Roland Krause wrote:
> > > > I'd suggest to try and keep it KDE-2 compatible as long as
> possible. At
> > > > least until the first beta release of KDE-3. Actually we will
> not
> > > > release anything with KDE-3, or?
> > >
> > > Until there's nothing comparable we'll release KDevelop-2.0.x
> with KDE-3
> > > because it's already now ready to use, stable and the same
> full-featured
> > > as with KDE-2.
> > > Anyone with a different opinion?
> > >
> > > Ciao,F at lk
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > to unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> > > kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
> unsubscribe
> > > »your-email-address«
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> -
> to unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
> unsubscribe »your-email-address«

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com

-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«