kate part (was: Re: fileselector plugin)
gigafalk at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 22 21:57:23 UTC 2001
Roland Krause wrote:
> I think it is not a good idea to make kdebase a requirement for
> kdevelop. The parts of kate that are essential for us (an improved
> kwrite/ktexteditor part) should move into kdelibs where they belong.
> kate itself can then stay in kdebase.
Why don't we move it NOW!?
F at lk
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
More information about the KDevelop-devel