kate part (was: Re: fileselector plugin)

F@lk Brettschneider gigafalk at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 22 21:57:23 UTC 2001

Roland Krause wrote:
> I think it is not a good idea to make kdebase a requirement for
> kdevelop. The parts of kate that are essential for us (an improved
> kwrite/ktexteditor part) should move into kdelibs where they belong.
> kate itself can then stay in kdebase.
Why don't we move it NOW!?

F at lk

Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list