Plugin Arch. for KDevelope 2.0
bernd at physik.hu-berlin.de
Mon Aug 6 07:45:37 UTC 2001
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Richard Dale wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2001, you wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Sandy Meier wrote:
> > > To come to a conclusion on this issue. Until we change our license model (a
> > > GPL'ed KDevelop), it is allowed to distribute C/C++ plugins only under GPL or
> > > compatible licenses (LGPL,X11 and so on.). For Java we don't have a solution
> > > yet. Richard maybe?
> > > If no one objects this will be the "official" position for the next time. ok?
> > The problem with this interpretation is that we already have a
> > plugin (namely the java one) which links GPL code with a proprietary
> > library, namely libjvm.
> Only because of my ineptitude with autoconf :-). The java macros you can get
> from the autoconf site always look for open source Kaffe first for 'political
> reasons' (according to program comments). So I would certainly like to improve
> the KDE macro that looks for Java stuff, including libjvm, so that it looks for
> open source resources first. I don't know what Kaffe calls its libs yet, but it
> should be easy to have the choice to link against both.
Ah good, I didn't know that vm's are compatible on that level.
BTW, there is an article about writing Java programs with Qt in the
magazine freeX. German only I think...
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
More information about the KDevelop-devel