KDevelop presented at CeBit exhibition in Hannover, Germany

[jbb]

On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, you wrote:
> > 
> > Hmm
> > 
> > Which will be harder
> > 
> > porting the new bits of kdevelop1.1 into kdevelop2.0
> > or
> > porting 1.1 then adding the new pieces from the current kdevelop2.0
> > 
> > There was a lot of work from the kdevelop 2 branch point (which was quite
> > some time prior to 1.0 IIRC) to the 1.1 version, so finding and changing (if
> > not obsoleted by new code) is going to be difficult.
> > 
> > I think the amount of work will be a bit of a toss of the coin as to which is
> > easier, but if a 1.1 port is done then you'll have a better platform to
> > continue developing kdevelop2.
> 
> Hi!
> 
> "Porting 1.1 then adding the new pieces from the current kdevelop2" would be
> _much_ more harder and more timeconsuming.  We will need 3-4 weeks to port
> KDevelop1.1 (it is really difficult, believe me) and than "readding" new
> outputviews (colored), new component framework (see classes "ComponentManager"
> and "Component"), MDI/Dockwidget incl. new filehandling, new doctree
> (config),many codecleanups and so..... 
> 
> I would prefer to adding the features from the 1.1release and not port the
> 1.1release.

That's okay. Some bits will be missed I'm sure but then, that's life.
I shall start on the debugger soonish...

-- 
Regards,

jbb
http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~jbb
ICQ: 60412209