linuxgroupie at ivanhawkes.com
Sun Dec 10 22:12:04 UTC 2000
On Sunday 10 December 2000 9:31 pm, you wrote:
> John Birch wrote:
> > It would be good if the framework could deal in this concept without the
> > details - perhaps something like
> > void getData(KDataEvent* data);
> > and subclassing the KDataEvent to the special knowledge required.
> It's not bad to have a set of basic "events".
> ...additionally to that general "KDataEvent" base class which I
> understood that it is the transmission medium and which must be casted
> on receiver site to a certain "event", right?
I would tend to agree with what I have heard from John on the component
interfaces. These should be well defined at the outset, and have a very
limited number of features. If you are looking to build a system that others
can build upon then you need to ensure the coupling between system features
is kept as minimal as possible.
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
More information about the KDevelop-devel