kdevelop1.4 (aka kdevelop1.3port)
rich at ipso-facto.freeserve.co.uk
Thu Dec 7 01:54:22 UTC 2000
John Birch wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Dec 2000 11:48, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > John Birch wrote:
> > > > Yes, I thought about that, too. Well, replacing it with designer is
> > > > another thing. We could just leave out the switch button and menu entry
> > > > and throw the dialog editor out.
> > >
> > > Good, I'll remove the dialog editor. I'll leave the button in and do a
> > > KRun(whateverTheSyntaxIsToRunQtDesigner) when someone presses that
> > > button. can removed if we don't like it later. (You wouldn't believe how
> > > much this simplifies the port :-)
> > >
> > > > Ahh...and yes, I´d like to have the patch, please ;)
> > >
> > > Should be in you in-box now...
> > Got it, thanks.
> > BTW: seems kdevelop is much slower now in the port than the original KDE
> > 1 version. Well, still needs some cleanup but the speed really worries
> > me.
> Yes - same here - but with one very noticable exception - the debugger works
> _much_ _much_ faster :-) The "switch between files and clipboard and process"
> problem isn't a problem on my machine (at the moment).
> The speed decrease is quite interesting since the code is a port ... hmmm
This is commonly a result of unnecessary unicode conversions.
Once most of the code is using QString natively things should
> to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
> unsubscribe »your-email-address«
Richard Moore rich at ipso-facto.freeserve.co.uk
http://www.macromedia.com/ rjmoore at macromedia.com
http://developer.kde.org/ rich at kde.org
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
More information about the KDevelop-devel